Официальная страница политика и общественного деятеля

Наталии Алексеевны Нарочницкой

Н. Нарочницкая член Комиссии, при Президенте Российской Федерации по противодействию попыткам фальсификации истории в ущерб интересам России.

Наталия Алексеевна Нарочницкая – известный ученый, общественно-политический деятель, православный идеолог, доктор исторических наук

Европейский институт демократии и сотрудничества (Париж) возглавляет Наталия Алексеевна Нарочницкая

Фонд исторической перспективы (ФИП) был создан в 2004 году Наталией Алексеевной Нарочницкой и группой ее соратников.

Информационно-аналитический портал, посвященный деятельности российского ученого, общественного деятеля Наталии Алексеевны Нарочницкой

Декабрь 2011
Пн Вт Ср Чт Пт Сб Вс
« Ноя    
  1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  



– almost as the pseudomorphosis of religion.

Revolution as an idea was a Western creature and could be a product only of an apostate and delirious Christian mind, not of a Buddhist one. It was a Goya’s phantasmagoria – a product of a human mind that had lost the link with God and out of pride could not tolerate his own and the world’s imperfection – another type of nihilism. The more Christian before the fall – that is ardently believing in the apocalyptic momentary annihilation of all sins and imperfections – the more destructive in self-imposed role of a final judge and creator of a new era on human criteria… At the time of Marxism which brought revolution to the level of science – Europe was already too sceptical and too practical – too lukewarm and Russia took over.

Ironically, the criteria of ethics were declared relevant to the stage of society, to the «mode of production», the end – justifying the means. Йgalitй on earth ironically meant the ethical inequality for «non-historical» classes and individuals – they became means. The challenge was universal and traditional culture was first and foremost target.

The West’s intelligentsia, atheist and materialist, was, in spirit, an admirer of the philosophical foundations of Marxism. Why did they sang tribute to the Great October, and did not like the USSR after the May 1945 that re-established some traditional values? They were disappointed with the USSR, that had lost the «necessary» degree of «leftness», but not with the idea of overthrowing the God-given world and hierarchy, i.e. not with the idea of revolution. The left spirit wandered from West to East and back changing his instruments when they were worn out.

The disappointed «blazing’’ European intellectuals were again calling for a revolution that would be more uncompromising than the one of the Great October, since the latter had gone decadent proclaiming «bourgeois» ideals – Nikita Chrustchev’s slogan «to catch up with America». Now from the «decadent» world, from the lukewarm West to the jungles went Regis Debrй, E. Che Guevara, Polpot – a graduate of la Sorbonne. The remainder of them demonstrated a splash of nihilism – a spiritual phenomenon of clear left nature in the New Testament sense – that characterises of all the West in social life and culture.

The student riots of the sixties were irrationally anti-etatist in nature; literature, music, theatre of the «absurd»- obviously rooted in the pre-revolution Avant-garde and revolutionary Meierhold Theatre with its openly declared goal of «an aesthetic shooting of the past». The Hippies – a passive revolution, a negation of all God’s gifts, indifference to good and evil as illusion – this explaining the later popularity of Buddhism and Hinduism and neo-Paganism in the West. Finally, «new left» and «new right» – forms of the very same yearnings for planetary Utopia and revolution named by the new-rights the Conservative Revolution… Even the Western bastion of Christian tradition – the Catholic science was besieged by the leftist «theology of liberation». The long forgotten religious Christian contemplation on earthly sins and imperfections manifested both in literature and in the Catholic Church documents.

After centuries of dispute and rivalry between Latin – Gothic – Roman-Germanic spirit and Orthodox St.John’s spirit, at this juncture both – post-communist Russians and the remaining true European spirit are being subjected to pressure by the «Atlantic» cosmopolitan liberal project of one world and universal human values. Why?

A characteristic feature of the branch of American ideology that produced «atlantisism» and «one world» doctrine – another (after communism) version of the universal kingdom of man – is messianism based on the providential beliefs of the puritans inspired by the Old Testament as the patriarch of the Anglo-Saxon historical science wrote.

Before A.Toynbee it was M.Weber, who had stated one of the central features of the Puritan philosophy – «a methodically rationalised fulfilment of its messianic predestination», and asserted that a true Calvinist was much more self-assured in his choseness than a devout and God-obeying Old Testament Jew. (WEBER 1994, 265-275). That is true – it was certainly not the Job in sufferance with his greatness in self-rejection in «dust and ashes» (JOB. 42.5) who inspired a true Yankee.

Weber also stated that Puritanism was the driving force of the Western society and economy. If it is so, it brings us to assume that the surrender of Europe to the Anglo-Saxon – American – political, economical and cultural domination was simply inevitable. Europe – the cradle of liberalism ironically could not be leader in its implementation. The European philosophy of state and law and ethics had under the ashes of revolutions a catholic foundation, these ethics were only amended to suit the needs of a usurer. They could not become the locomotive of the liberal economics and of an inevitable idolisation of a man without constant conflict with its own canons of the inherent human sinfulness, of the altruistic ideal of a true bearer of the Apostolic Christian legacy.

On the contrary, American puritans have been building their chiliastic human kingdom with the throne for themselves with messianic zeal, proving their «choseness» by the earthly success as J. Calvin taught. It was a clear departure from the Nine Commandments for the blessed and it was the decision and choice for power and bread

Читать далее:   1 2 3 4 5 6

В архиве 22 декабря 2003

Добавить комментарий

Для отправки комментария вы должны авторизоваться.


У всех кавказских войн немусульманские режиссеры.

RSS Новости Фонда

  • Состоялась презентация книги "Дело партизана Кононова" 16.11.2011
  • «Россия и Испания: Очарование через расстояния» 31.10.2011
  • В Париже прошел вечер дебатов «Европе не избежать переустройства собственной архитектуры безопасности» 31.10.2011
  • Состоялась конференция «П.А.Столыпин и современная Россия» 30.10.2011
Rambler's Top100